Dealer Outlook

Trade Only Dealer Outlook Blog

Who creates more problems, lawmakers or regulators?

It’s an entertaining question, brought on by the current debate about extending the payroll tax cut (here we go again!) and the battle between America’s Catholic bishops and the White House over contraception, among other issues.

For me, there’s little doubt that the actions of lawmakers on federal and state levels can create myriad problems, with unpopular and often unintended consequences. Perhaps it’s why Congress currently has the lowest rating in history. I dare say most state legislatures probably don’t get any higher ratings, either.

But it seems to me that when it comes to creating the greatest mess, especially for small businesses, the regulators should be ranked even lower than lawmakers.

At first, the creation of our regulatory system was a good thing — intended to be helpful and solve problems that might not otherwise be addressed — to implement specific policies that protect public health, welfare and safety. But the power and authorities Congress (and state legislatures) has handed to agencies are immense.

They now impact virtually everything we can, or cannot, do in business. As a result, the regulatory process all too often results in rules that fail to deliver the desired objective, fail to meet genuine public benefit needs and result in overreach at its biggest. The E15 ethanol debacle, ordering 54.5 mpg CAFÉ standards and the styrene dilemmas are examples that immediately come to mind.

Truth is, the regulatory process is out of control. Witness the Tennessee Department of Revenue’s claim that a man who built a small wooden boat in his garage with his 7-year-old son is a taxable boat dealer. We’re seeing on the federal and state levels an avalanche of regulations and interpretations that are overly broad and financially burdensome. Moreover, it’s apparent that agencies rush imposition of regulations prematurely, casting to the wind any careful look at other possibilities that could be more efficient, less damaging and more effective — Biobutanol, for example.

Sadly, because agencies have been given so much authority with little real oversight, they’re in a position to simply decide what they want to do, draft some regulation they want, and then undertake some study or analysis that is solely aimed at rationalizing their regulation. In addition, instead of being a critical component of the decision-making process, any required economic analysis is usually done as a postscript, and any negative results are reported as “within acceptable limits” to further justify the agency’s action. Talk about overreach.

The problem isn’t new. Virtually every president’s first executive order after coming into office directs all federal agencies to examine systemic problems and review alternatives to ensure any proposed regulatory benefits come at acceptable costs. Further, the agencies are ordered to conduct comprehensive analyses before developing any final regulations. But all of these presidential orders haven’t changed anything. Fact is, it’s really Congress that needs to make serious regulatory changes. Anything else is lip service.

And in case you wondering, President Obama did follow suit by issuing Executive Order 13563 after taking office. It said, in part: “General Principles of Regulation: Our regulatory system … must be based on the best available science. It must allow for public participation and an open exchange of ideas. It must promote predictability and reduce uncertainty. It must identify and use the best, most innovative and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends. It must take into account benefits and costs, both quantitative and qualitative. It must ensure that regulations are accessible, consistent, written in plain language, and easy to understand. It must measure, and seek to improve, the actual results of regulatory requirements.”

That’s right thinking! So how do you think that’s all working out?


8 comments on “Who creates more problems, lawmakers or regulators?

  1. Charles Windsor

    The Law makers do a really poor job of writing the laws. They commonly transfer excessive control to the administrative branch to “write the rules”. That is law making that should only be performed by legislative branch.

    It is the lawmakers that cause all of the problems.

  2. HV

    Law makers are typically lawyers. Shouldn’t we become highly suspicious of a group or class of lawyers
    who are making rules, either so bad that their brainchild is full of loopholes or so grafty its full of intended loopholes. Ironicly, the very loopholes, intentional or otherwise (stupidity) are keeping the purveyors of the legal profession very busy and in the money. Either as law makers, lobbyists or defense counsel.

    Oh, in the case of our federal law makers, they’d manage to impose AND exempt themselves of the very laws they dreamed up.

    Didn’t the French have an effective solution? Guilotine….

  3. CaptA


    I agree with Charles. The regulations are in place to implement the statutes. All regulations, since the President H.W. Bush are required to be reviewed by both the OMB (Executive Branch) and CBO (Legislative Branch). You can not place blame on the regulators. The blame lies squarely with the legislature(s). E15 ethanol , ordering 54.5 mpg CAFÉ standards and the styrene dilemmas are examples of Legistlative and Executive directives–NOT regulators.

    Stop attacking the regulators, they do the bidding of the lawmakes and executives, whom are elected by the people.

  4. Stan

    So what’s the way out? Other than hitting the “Reset” button of replacing the government and all its rules and laws with brand new from scratch, is there any way out? Or are we destined to keep digging deeper and deeper?

    I know it’s not polite to get political here. But considering that it’s the politicians who caused the mess, I have to get political: I decided that it’s the Republicans and the Democrats who run things. The Libertarian Party is the only one that advocates LESS government. LESS government, LESS regulations, LESS taxes, and LESS government spending. So I became a Libertarian. But things are such a mess now, that I’m not sure that if the Libertarians were voted into every elected office today, that even they could get us out any time soon…

  5. enginecom

    The answer is OMG, Obama Must Go! The rest should fall in place if enough TEA perty members get elected to Congress. There needs to be a unified voice of reason. Currently there are too many ideas with no agreement. Both parties are to blame and if there were term limits there would not be people in Congress for so many terms. We need to clean house including these crazy leftists in the White House. The Left is anti-business which is a no go for growth. The EPA doesn’t care about economic impact only ideology. Things must change or we will need to study Mandarin.

  6. e

    Oh yea its good to see things on the up swing. Just drive down my waterfront road and see the 100% vacant marinas. while the local regulators are going full swing to drive another marina out of business

  7. CaptainA


    I disagree with you 100% about the EPA. I think the EPA does care about economic impact and the environment. The EPA executes the orders from the Whitehouse and the Congress. Don’t blame the regulators. They are doing the job they have been ordered to do.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. For more information, please see our Comments Policy.