Dealer Outlook

Trade Only Dealer Outlook Blog

Are “green” products stuck on your shelves?

I went into my dealer’s to buy a bottle of “green” boat soap. I handed him a $50 bill and apologized for not having anything small. “That’s alright,” he said. “You can bring me the rest later!”

That’s an old joke, of course. But, it does reflect the fact that green products are decidedly more expensive. It also calls attention to an increasing number of observers who report green product sales have slumped, particularly since the start of the recession. Others claim it’s not the recession but a growing aversion to the expensive side of environmentalism. It’s likely both.

For example, while 85 percent of consumers report they’ve purchased green products, only about 8 percent say they do it most of the time, according to studies by Grail Research (grailresearch.com). Moreover, almost two-thirds of consumers have changed their buying habits because of the recession. Price is the main reason they cite for choosing not to buy green.

Grail divides these consumers into two groups: “light green” and “dark green.” The latter are more committed, probably older, more educated, more affluent and considered more likely to regularly buy green. But, are boaters really “dark green” and do they buy accordingly, or are they following the general pattern of passing up more expensive green products?

No studies have been done on boaters’ green purchasing habits. Logically, boaters are presumed to fit the “dark green” mold. That’s because they’re expected to have a better understanding of what green means (i.e. impacts on our waterways). Still, that’s just an assumption. Overall, consumer spending on green products has dropped as much as 40 percent. That’s even led to some green products, for example Essentials multisurface cleaner and glass cleaner by Arm & Hammer, being dropped from the market.

Overall, it appears the heart of any decision to buy green nowadays boils down to these considerations. First, there must be a conviction that the product is as green as it claims and that it will do an equal or better job than its conventional, less expensive counterpart. Many consumers reportedly question the impact some green products claim to make. 

Second, it’s usually down to price. Sure, some customers will happily pay more for a product they believe is green. But, the higher price for green, especially when it sits on the shelf next to the cheaper conventional one, will be the deciding factor. As the New York Times recently reported, shoppers queried, for example, in the Chicago area indicated cost was the deciding factor. Said one woman: “If it’s green and it’s a good deal, I’ll buy it.” Presumably, if it’s not on sale, she wouldn’t.

As an industry, we project an image of being green. It’s natural for us to care about the environment in which we live and boat. That said, however, we’re also in business and when market research shows a decline in the purchasing of green products, it’s wise to check our shelves, selling history, watch our reorders and make the green items “good deals” to move them out.

Comments

5 comments on “Are “green” products stuck on your shelves?

  1. Ken

    The cost of being green is an issue. And not just the marine industry.

    Many times we comment that we would love to be more green, if we could afford it.

  2. Skeptical

    Since green products first made their appearance years ago, they’ve never sold well for us. The first concern was how well they worked, and the second issue was price. When customers ask for our assistance, we offer the green products along with the “regular” versions, in case they would be interested. Now they comment on price first, but they still comment that the green product is probably “wimpy” compared to the regular version.

    People need to see some test results to prove if there really is a good product out there, and that their fears are perception rather than reality, They may be willing to pay slightly more, but not much.

    Is there a legitimate reason why a “green” cleaning product, for example, is more expensive than the original one, when it usually doesn’t work as well as the tried and true version? Or are the mfrs just taking advantage of people’s wanting to support environmental products, so they think they can price the product higher?

  3. Len Schlesinger

    Speaking as a consumer; one who is “older”, “better educated”, but probably not really “affluent”, I would have to say that the term “green” has become offensive. Care and concern for our environment is basic to all of us. Unfortunately, both government and industry expect the consumer to drop big bucks whenever a product carries a certain label. At the same time, the term “better educated” implies the ability to objectively analyze a product or service. In too many cases the label and the analysis do not agree.
    Has Ethanol cleaned the air and not raised food prices? Have high efficiency, low water use toilets actually saved water? Did the “new Coke” taste better than the old stuff? Does stocking the shelves with overpriced, ineffective products improve the bottom line?
    I’ll continue to buy what works and I hope you will keep stocking it on your shelves.

  4. C. Moore

    Next step is to follow the European model the Fed’s seem to be pushing us to emulate.
    The Euro Government model is:
    If the folks won’t purchase the more expensive, not as effective, Greener stuff, our special interest supporters are making. Then we, “The ones who know whats best for all”, must tax the proven to perform, cheaper to purchase, not concidered as green by us stuff, made by those who don’t support our agenda’s.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. For more information, please see our Comments Policy.